Corinne Rousseau reports that 2003 “is much better than we thought”. It was so ripe at first that we weren’t sure what to make of it but now it’s clear that it’s at least very good and may very well turn out to be outstanding as the wines possess superb concentration. As to the growing season, we began the harvest on August 23 rd and continued through to the 31 st. We lost about 50% of a normal crop but at least sugars were good, coming in between 13.5 and 13.7%. There was clearly low acidity but decent pHs and because there wasn’t much malic acid to begin with, there really wasn’t much of a change in pH or total acidities before and after the malos. We shortened the cuvaison to 10 days from the usual 15 and there was also a good deal less pigeage. We were constantly tasting the musts, in fact multiple times a day, even sometimes hourly to make sure that we weren’t going to create tannic monsters, which would have been easy to do. I believe that 2003 will age much better than many people believe, and this is particularly true at the grand cru level.”. The Rousseau ‘03s are really quite impressive a good deal less ’03 in style than most. For readers who may no be aware, the oak regimen chez Rousseau varies considerably, with the Gevrey up through the Mazis being aged in 2 years old wood, the Clos de la Roche and Ruchottes in 15% new wood and the “big three” in 100% new wood. The present plan is to bottle as usual in July though some of the lower level wines might be bottled in May, depending on how the fruit matures. (Frederick Wildman and Sons, New York, NY, Berry Brothers & Rudd, The Wine Society, Heyman, Barwell & Jones, O.W. Loeb and Justerini & Brooks, all UK)
|
|
||
Number 104, 2003 |
|
||
| Clive Coates' The Vine No. 240 / January 2005 2003 Red Burgundy |
![]() |
Charles Rousseau, who is now 81 years old, macerated his 2003s for 10 days rather than 15. I found the Mazy a little diffuse (usually it’s the Charmes), but the rest of the range was very lovely. |
|
|
||